Difference between Mixbus and Mixbus 32C.About This Manual (online version and PDF download).If you feel these circumstances may have coloured the content, please leave a comment below. I was given a license for Mixbus 7 and 32c, however I purchased the product with my own money with intent to use it. I chat with Mixbus and Ardour devs often. I spot checked multiple tests due to the slipping buffers.This appears to indicate that, on my test setup at least, the lowered latency only appears to be at the 64-sample buffer size. The only notable variation is the 64 sample buffer, which was 3ms more latent in the first tests.They all returned practically identical results. As the differences between these results and my prior results varied slightly, I reran tests on Reaper, Pro Tools and Cubase.I do not recall having any increased latency while running Mixbus 7 during these tests. If I ran a test then walked away for an hour, with nothing but Mixbus running on my system, the latency would increase a significant amount. Mixbus 6 was more likely to have drifting latency.Notably for me: Mixbus 6 and 7 crashed frequently during these tests when changing buffer sizes unless I stopped the engine to change, then started the engine back.Mixbus 7 still does not have “MIDI Jitter.Latency when the Limiter is on is effectively identical. Mixbus 7 has reduced latency when the mixer is turned off for the 64 sample buffer size.Your browser does not support the video tag. Because of this behaviour, there’s a chance that the measurements may not match previous results. This meant that I often needed to restart mixbus and re-run measurements multiple times to confirm. It often drifts when changing buffers (if it doesn’t crash!). NOTE - Mixbus 6 seems to have a strange issue with latency. 1024 Samples with Limiter engaged (reports 21.3ms latency).256 Samples with Limiter engaged (reports 5.3ms latency). ![]() 64 Samples with Limiter engaged (reports 1.3ms latency).1024 Samples without Limiter engaged (reports 21.3ms latency).256 Samples without Limiter engaged (reports 5.3ms latency). ![]() 64 Samples without Limiter engaged (reports 1.3ms latency).Let’s start with the results so you can get back to what you were doing. ![]() Do the tests yourself, or at least double check my data. Reminder, don’t trust dweebs on the internet. If you want to see how each DAW stacks up relative to each other, please check the other articles in this series for a relative comparison. Your audio device and system may have different latency numbers. REMEMBER - These numbers only mean something relative to each other on my system. I have added additional testing without the limiter this round. Previous tests were done with Limiter On, because that is the default state of Mixbus when you open a project. Kontakt will no longer run on my machine and I have no interest in debugging it. Hardware is unchanged.įor this round I used MSoundFactory’s Drum Sampler. I’ve heard that Mixbus 7 might have better latency, so let’s start it off with the elephant in the room: Mixbus latency. Mixbus 7 is out and I’ll be exploring the new feature(s) in the next 4 posts.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |